Skip to content

ci(gitlab): Initial GitLab setup #11576

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

ci(gitlab): Initial GitLab setup #11576

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lucasssvaz
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of Change

This pull request introduces enhancements to the GitLab CI configuration, including the addition of workflow rules, default settings, and a sample job. The changes aim to streamline pipeline management, improve flexibility, and provide examples for usage.

Workflow configuration updates:

  • .gitlab-ci.yml: Added workflow rules to control pipeline execution based on branch, tag, and pipeline source conditions. Introduced variables for merge request pipelines and scheduled runs, and included common and sample workflow files for modularity.

Default settings for pipelines:

  • .gitlab/workflows/common.yml: Defined default pipeline stages (pre_check, build, test, result) and variables (ESP_IDF_VERSION, ESP_ARDUINO_VERSION). Added retry logic for handling runner failures and job execution timeouts.

Example job:

  • .gitlab/workflows/sample.yml: Added a hello-world job in the test stage that outputs a greeting message, demonstrating basic usage of GitLab CI.

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz self-assigned this Jul 9, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello lucasssvaz, we appreciate your contribution to this project!

📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.
🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.
Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 48f0022

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz closed this Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz

Labels
Type: CI & Testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@lucasssvaz